Sport Business Between Financialisation, Media Dependency and Structural Instability: A Critique of the Myth of a Sustainably Profitable Industry
Contemporary sport is frequently presented as a continuously growing industry, characterised by expanding revenues, the internationalisation of competitions and growing investor attractiveness. Record broadcasting rights valuations, the appreciation of professional clubs and the involvement of international financial actors have reinforced the perception of a sector that is economically robust and strategically promising. In this context, sport is often assimilated to a model of economic success combining media visibility, audience emotional engagement and monetisation potential.
However, this representation rests on a partial and largely idealised reading of the sector's economic dynamics. A thorough analysis reveals that the sport business is traversed by major structural tensions that call into question the sustainability of its economic models. Far from being a stable and intrinsically profitable industry, sport appears as a hybrid system — dependent on external resources, subject to competing logics and exposed to specific forms of instability.
This article deconstructs the myth of a naturally high-performing sport business by analysing the mechanisms of financialisation, media dependencies and internal contradictions that characterise this sector.
I. The Financialisation of Sport: Between Valorisation and Fragility
The transformation of sport into a global industry has been accompanied by a process of financialisation, marked by the entry of financial actors, the growth of investment and the pursuit of profitability. Professional clubs — particularly in the major European leagues — have progressively adopted management logics inspired by the corporate world, integrating objectives of valorisation, growth and return on investment.
This financialisation is manifested notably in the acquisition of clubs by investment funds, billionaires or sovereign wealth funds, who perceive sport as a strategic asset. It is accompanied by an inflation in valuations that are often disconnected from the real financial performance of these organisations. In many cases, clubs report operating deficits while displaying high valuations founded on growth anticipations or brand symbolic value.
However, this dynamic carries significant risks. Dependence on external investors exposes organisations to logics that are not necessarily aligned with sporting objectives. Furthermore, pressure for profitability can lead to decisions that undermine competitive balance or compromise long-term financial stability.
II. Dependence on Broadcasting Rights: Revenue Concentration and Systemic Risk
One of the central elements of the modern sport economic model resides in broadcasting rights. These constitute, for many organisations, the principal revenue source — far exceeding income from ticketing or merchandise. This evolution is directly linked to the growing mediatisation of competitions and the rise of streaming platforms.
However, this dependence on media rights creates a concentration of revenues around a limited number of actors — notably the largest leagues and most mediatised clubs. Smaller organisations struggle to benefit from this dynamic, which accentuates inequalities within the sector.
Moreover, this model is exposed to systemic risks. Broadcasting revenues depend on the ability of broadcasters to monetise content, which is itself conditioned by the evolution of consumer behaviours and competition between platforms. The fragmentation of audiences — linked to the diversification of media and content — can affect the value of these rights in ways that are difficult to predict.
III. Deconstructing a Dominant Belief: 'Sporting Performance Generates Economic Performance'
A widely held belief in sport business establishes a direct relationship between sporting performance and economic performance. According to this logic, on-field successes mechanically translate into increased revenues through greater visibility, the attraction of sponsors and increased sales.
However, this relationship is far from systematic. Sporting performance is by nature uncertain and difficult to control, depending on multiple factors such as individual performances, competition contingencies and, occasionally, officiating decisions. Furthermore, the investments required to achieve high performance levels — notably in player salaries and transfers — can be considerable.
In many cases, the pursuit of sporting performance leads to expenditure increases that are not compensated by proportional revenue growth, leaving clubs in financially fragile situations despite satisfactory sporting results.
IV. Sport as a Hybrid System: Tensions Between Economic, Sporting and Political Logics
Sport is characterised by the coexistence of multiple logics that are not necessarily compatible. The economic logic aims to maximise revenues and ensure the financial viability of organisations. The sporting logic rests on the pursuit of performance and respect for the rules of competition. The political logic manifests through state and institutional intervention, notably in the organisation of major events.
These different logics can enter into tension. The pursuit of profitability can lead to decisions contrary to sporting equity — such as the concentration of resources within a limited number of clubs. Equally, political stakes can influence the attribution of events or the decisions of governing bodies.
This hybridity makes sport governance particularly complex, as decisions must account for multiple and often contradictory objectives, limiting the capacity to define coherent strategies.
V. Towards a Reconfiguration of Sport Business: From Growth to Sustainability
In the face of these tensions, a reconfiguration of the sport business appears necessary. Rather than pursuing a logic of continuous growth, organisations must interrogate the sustainability of their economic models.
This implies diversifying revenue sources, controlling costs and developing strategies less dependent on immediate sporting results. It also requires rethinking governance to integrate the various stakeholders and account for social and environmental stakes.
In this context, the role of sport executives is evolving. It is no longer simply a matter of maximising revenues but of building organisations capable of withstanding fluctuations and establishing themselves sustainably — a challenge that demands a fundamentally different conception of strategic success.
The sport business, often presented as a model of economic success, reveals itself in reality as a complex system marked by structural tensions and unstable equilibria. Financialisation, dependence on broadcasting rights and the uncertainty linked to sporting performance challenge the durability of its economic models.
The genuine problematic of sport business resides not in the capacity to generate revenues but in the ability to build sustainable models capable of reconciling economic, sporting and social imperatives — a challenge that places sophisticated governance and long-term strategic thinking at the centre of executive sport leadership.
Advance Your Executive Career
Explore our Oxford-based programmes